Stock vs. Art Prints
When it comes down to creating things for other most designers don’t have a chance to fully live out their creative souls. Somehow we all have to make ends meet, but besides doing stuff for bread and butter, what should you do in between jobs? As a creative you always have choices, you can create stuff for yourself, paint pictures, take photos or design t-shirts to name a few things.
Two of the easiest things an artist can do are Photo or Vector Stock, or selling Art as art prints. But what is better? What gives the better revenues?
The fun of Stock Art
When you are creating stock art you have some very nice and interesting challenges! One way to approach Stock is to sell leftovers of others jobs that were paying your rent. For example you created a set of icons that are left over now and can sell them at a stock site. Or, which is one of my favorites, you can actually approach stock art with a scientific approach, research and look what people buy, or create your own killer art for niches where you think the potential is high. The best part is that you can create whatever you want, at least if it is on a high technical level. You can do what you want and test if there are people buying it. The more you have, the more you can potentially sell. As with everything else stock can be a numbers game, but it must not be. You can upload 20 pieces that you love, but no one downloads and then the next piece is making a killing. You never know what you will make. Some people might call this a risk, but no risk, no fun
The love for Art Prints
Art Prints are even better than Stock Art when it comes to do what you love. You can simply create your art and upload it to some site that offers art prints of your work. Zazzle for example. You can promote those pieces on your site and get a share of the revenue. You don’t have to get files approved, can do whatever you want to do, you just have to find people that dig your style and buy your art. Simple as that. You can make a lot, get a name, whatever. You weed out a lot of people in between when you self publish your art. The problem is that you have to take care of marketing and presentation. If you rock at this you can make a killing with art prints, and if you already have a name, you can probably get some better deals, or use this as an additional source of income.
Passive income for the Win
No matter which way you choose, or if you do it both, passive income should be what every artist strives for. Corporate art like stock art is a great way. Especially in financial crises when people don’t have much money to spend you can make a good living from a lot of people with a little money. It’s no substitution for your real art, photo’s or whatever you do. It’s something you can easily do in between, or use leftovers or you specialise in it. There are people with 400-500 files being downloaded 60.000 times +, each download worth a couple of bucks. Especially generic vector stock sells very well considering the amount of time spend on the files. Try to create a few income streams that might grow into real rivers, but even a few raindrops are a nice addition for the notoriously underfunded artists that are out there.
